With the increasing trend of crime rate and limitations of formal CRIMINAL JUSTICE system in controlling crime, development of new scientific strategies for enhancing effectiveness of CRIMINAL JUSTICE programs and policies has been unavoidable. The main question which should be addressed by the CRIMINAL JUSTICE management is that what is the role of scientific findings and knowledge management in shaping and leading of CRIMINAL JUSTICE INTERVENTIONS?Reaching to an effective and efficient CRIMINAL JUSTICE system requires deep and comprehensive understanding of CRIMINAL JUSTICE challenges; basic knowledge about theoretical and philosophical aspects of CRIMINAL JUSTICE in the cultural and social content of Iran, enhancing skills of the CRIMINAL JUSTICE practitioners and authorities in planning indigenized model of CRIMINAL JUSTICE INTERVENTIONS; and also producing knowledge and information for evaluating results and process of CRIMINAL JUSTICE INTERVENTIONS. Poor planning and faulty problem analysis are the primary reasons that stop many CRIMINAL JUSTICE intervention fail to live up to their promise.

The legislator may define some behaviors as new crimes whenever necessary in order to protect the values of the society. This action can be likened to a temporary tranquilizer to remedy the social problems. The great volume of laws reveals that penal laws are first solutions to the legislator but what is crucial is the practical assessment of CRIMINAL JUSTICE INTERVENTIONS. These INTERVENTIONS have paramount importance in economic fields because economic crimes have dedicated a huge part to themselves. Yet, the legislator has not recognized it as an independent issue and thus made complexity and disorder in legislations and subsequently in different institutions on how to deal with different crimes. This is quite inappropriate because when it come to dealing with a crime, transparency of laws has a ~I direct relationship with the culprit's rights.

McDonaldization is an official process in which the principles of fast food restaurants are exercised. The McDonaldization of various social institutions has succeeded because it provides advantages over other, usually older, methods of doing business. It has made McDonaldized social institutions bureaucratic and rational in a Weberian sense and, thus, more efficient, calculable, predictable, and controlling over people (often by nonhuman technologies). The principal problem with McDonaldized institutions, and another characteristic of the process, is irrationality or, as Ritzer calls it, the “irrationality of rationality.” A primary purpose of this essay is to expose some of the irrationalities of “McJUSTICE” and to suggest some possible responses to them.

the economic, political and social evolutions during the 1980s caused the CRIMINAL policies with emphasizing on the CRIMINAL strategies and separation from the scientific approaches in crime control face excessiveness and additionally putting aside the welfare policies, they have separated from CRIMINAL JUSTICE also. For efficiency of social policies in enabling people to access social JUSTICE, it is necessary the relationship between these two concepts. Social JUSTICE does not occur without CRIMINAL JUSTICE and CRIMINAL JUSTICE without social JUSTICE is useless, inefficient and unfair. The most important reasons for distinguishing between social JUSTICE and CRIMINAL JUSTICE are neglecting the role of citizens for proposing social and CRIMINAL policies and granting the citizenship rights being bound to obey obedience laws, emphasizing on CRIMINAL policy for reduction and prevention of crime, separating the CRIMINAL policy organization from social and welfare ones, applying management skills and techniques in organization of CRIMINAL JUSTICE systems, emphasizing on the quantity of the system achievements instead of focusing on the enhancement of quality and also the absence of the common guiding principles or general principles to codify CRIMINAL and social policies toward a goal. Besides dignifying the CRIMINAL procedures, the relationship between social JUSTICE and CRIMINAL JUSTICE has a significant importance to prevent budget waste, human and material resources and time and causes the citizens access the equal opportunities. The other positive consequences of the relationship between these two concepts are the citizen interest to the community, increasing legal stability and occurring legality. Achieving these results cannot take place unless the practical principles to creating relationship between them are recognized. The principles are: recognizing all citizens and respecting their rights, redistribution of opportunities, resources and equipment in order to increase citizen participation in community, the balance of citizen responsibility and stability and holism (comprehensiveness) in policing.

Violence is a phenomenon with various political, social, cultural, economic, legal and CRIMINAL dimensions; that is why there are various and different definitions for it. It can be discussed from two perspectives. On the one hand, people themselves resort to violence against each other or against government and on the other hand, the functioning of the institutions linked to official power, i.e., the government, may lead to violence against people. If the first type of violence, i.e., behavioral violence, appears in the form of a crime, it will lead to the legal reaction of government (punishment). The reaction of the government, whose type and limits must principally be determined by authorities, is subject to principles and rules the neglect of each of which in various legislative, judicial and executive stages may lead to violence against people (the second type of violence). The second type, that is constitutional violence, realized in the form of aggression upon individuals' rights by legislature or by officials is called structural or institutionalized violence. It is covert violence, occurring as the result of disfunctioning of CRIMINAL JUSTICE system and deviation of the fundamental CRIMINAL law principles in response to the first type of violence (CRIMINAL behavioral violence). In this article, the covert type of violence in the CRIMINAL JUSTICE system has been discussed.

Restorative JUSTICE is frequently portrayed as a new paradigm of CRIMINAL JUSTICE, which differs sharply from the dominant paradigm of retributive JUSTICE. Retributive JUSTICE paradigm focuses on punishment and just desert. In this paradigm crime defined as violation of the state.Retributivism is the view that punishment is justified on the grounds that wrongdoing merits punishment.Restorative JUSTICE paradigm emphasizes on problem solving and restores victim, offender and community. In this paradigm crime defined as violation of one person by another. "Restorative JUSTICE" signifies those measures that are designed to give victims of crime an opportunity to tell the offender about the impact of the offending on them and their families, and to encourage offenders to accept responsibility for, and to repair the harm they caused. Its general aims are to reduce re-offending, to restore the relationship between the victim and the offender that was disturbed by the offence, and to improve victim's experiences with the CRIMINAL JUSTICE system.

Categories of sexual deviations, its origins and how to face the risk of the contemporary issues that are particularly of interest to many scholars, sociologists, psychologists and criminologists have been primarily in response to the question of What we basically want to know their place in a deviant sexual behavior among professionals is a great conflict. Of these issues, considering how unjust CRIMINAL responsibility for sexual crimes committed in order to satisfy their sexual goals are more important will be. Because new scientific achievements have proven that many sexual deviant behavior when Tom was not the will and determination of a relative. In fact, many of them influenced by internal and external factors are committing a CRIMINAL deviant behavior and the issue of how to deal with this group of CRIMINAL offenders would benefit from more sensitive. Will be undermined - as the underpinning of CRIMINAL responsibility- in sexual deviants encounter the need to distinguish the perpetrators of the total will thereby requiring the addition of corrective and therapeutic approaches to prevent repeat offenses, targeted and useful to deal with sexual deviants.

Religion is a collection of practical and moral beliefs and orders that are set for the guidance and advancement of humans. Due to the fact that adherence to religious teachings leads to the prevention of sin, experts believe that religion has a preventive function in social fields and in forms such as crime and deviance. Although the relationship between religion and crime is one of the most challenging issues in criminology, criminological findings have often emphasized the preventive role of religion. However, religious-historical cuts show that in some cases, eclectic interpretations of religion lead to crime. Thus, this research aims to describe, interpret and explain the thoughts of CRIMINALs with religious eclecticism by using Fairclough's discourse analysis method. The findings of this research show that eclectic CRIMINALs, emphasizing divine duty, ideological traditionalism, holy jihad, and ideological pressure, on the one hand, seek to create Sharia discourse, and on the other hand, reproduce Sharia-based domination relations. However, as a final assessment, it should be said that eclectic CRIMINALs commit crimes by misunderstanding religion and misunderstanding religious teachings. Therefore, in these cases, the crime-causing religious ideology is the result of religious epistemological eclecticism, and this cannot negate the positive function of religion in crime prevention.

The present study; is a jurisprudential-legal subject. The content has been compiled through the analysis of various jurisprudential, legal, and linguistic sources, resulting in this written work. This research compares the characteristics of judicial JUSTICE in Islamic CRIMINAL laws with the principles of human rights. Judicial JUSTICE refers to adhering to fairness and impartiality in judicial matters and rendering judgments. This means that during judicial proceedings, the principles and standards of judicial JUSTICE must be observed for all parties involved, including the accused. The foundation of any society relies on respecting judicial rights and institutionalizing judicial JUSTICE. A judicial system is deemed just only when it adheres to all the principles of judicial JUSTICE. The significance of addressing this issue lies in the fact that judicial JUSTICE is one of the primary goals of judicial systems in both Islam and human rights frameworks. A society's judicial system must ensure the protection of individuals’ property, lives, and dignity in both codified laws and their implementation. Notably, the Islamic judicial system, derived from the teachings of the Quran, narrations, and the practical conduct of the infallible (peace be upon them), especially Imam Ali (peace be upon him), has emphasized judicial JUSTICE for centuries, forming the cornerstone of its structure. Judicial JUSTICE also holds a prominent place in international human rights documents; however, achieving this principle in the latter has taken centuries. Contrary to common perceptions suggesting that Islam may not prioritize judicial JUSTICE, the Islamic judicial system places significantly greater emphasis on this principle and its requirements compared to other systems.

There are some important and remarkable developments in the international law common aspect of which is the humanity considerations. The rise of the notion of international community implies fundamental interests and values of the community and this approach is considered as a fundamental goal in the modern world. States and other actors such as international organizations in the international community have proposed and used many different means for protecting these values but some of them aren’t effective and suitable and it seems that the CRIMINAL guarantee is needed for the stability of community. Therefore, the rise and development of international CRIMINAL law is one of the most important issues in this century and there are some intended and unintended consequences of the rise of international CRIMINAL law. So, mutual interaction between international CRIMINAL law and international community is true. Some other notions such as international legal order, public order and common good also play notable roles in this relationship and the practice of the International CRIMINAL tribunals and national courts is very important.